Step 01
Intent registration
An operator session initiates a trade-support workflow. Code produces a normalized intent for a routing decision that affects a reportable transaction threshold.
This walkthrough shows the artifacts produced when an AI-assisted trade-support workflow proposes a routing decision that affects a reportable transaction. The point is not to describe the control. The point is to show what the control produces.
The scenario maps to a capital markets environment where a technology risk or platform engineering team must prove that policy ran before execution, approval was bound to specific parameters, and the evidence chain can be reconstructed later.
Step 01
An operator session initiates a trade-support workflow. Code produces a normalized intent for a routing decision that affects a reportable transaction threshold.
Step 02
The control plane creates an approval request bound to the normalized parameters and routes it to the required approver level for the action type and threshold.
Step 03
The approver reviews the request and approves the bounded parameters. The control plane issues a signed approval envelope tied to the parameter digest.
Step 04
The trade-support workflow advances to an inference step. Gate verifies the envelope before the provider call proceeds and writes evidence before execution leaves the governed boundary.
Step 05
Claw advances to the tool execution step and verifies that the approval envelope digest matches the execution parameters before the tool call executes.
Step 06
The complete chain links intent, policy decision, approval request, approval envelope, pre-execution evidence, execution record, parameter comparison, and checkpoint.
Step 07
Three months later, an examiner asks for evidence for this trade action. The firm exports the chain and the reviewer verifies the artifacts without system access or operator explanation.
An auditor can start from the execution record and trace back to the original intent, policy version, approval request, approver identity, parameter digest, and checkpoint. Verification does not require access to the running system or an operator's explanation of what should have happened.